Lagos Avoids Engaging in Destructive Politics Because They Learn from the Best

For those drawing comparisons between the political conflicts in Lagos and those in Rivers, questioning why the president has not imposed a state of emergency there:

Many people who have been observing the political happenings in Rivers with a rational mindset, rather than an emotional one, would likely agree that Fubara has betrayed his supporters. Moreover, he has tried to outwit his benefactor. This culminated in the demolition of the state house of assembly, which is a significant violation. The president attempted to mediate among the conflicting parties, but those efforts did not yield any positive results. He escalated tensions by submitting a budget proposal to only four members of the house, being fully aware that this could be interpreted as a basis for impeachment. Additionally, he has been carrying out various government initiatives without informing the larger assembly.

Considering the ongoing tensions between Sanwo Olu and Obasa, it might be advisable for the governor to think about disbanding the Lagos House of Assembly or to avoid presenting his commissioners and budget for their consideration. Observations over time have illustrated that Obasa has habitually disrespected Sanwo Olu, a trend that has been evident for many years. Although some may find it hard to grasp the importance of this situation, my extensive political experience of over twenty-five years has provided me insights into these dynamics. I understand the impacts of ego and financial motivations, as well as the intricacies of political power dynamics and aspirations. Many hold the belief that Obasa’s behavior might be an attempt to negotiate a favorable succession with Governor Sanwo, as he seems to think that by asserting his power, he stands a better chance of becoming the next governor. However, this perspective might be incomplete; it is possible that the speaker’s motives were tied to negotiating contracts to meet commitments to his constituents. Regardless of the reality, Obasa participated in the political arena, and while his tactics may have been somewhat forceful and lacking in propriety, they were not entirely out of line. Concurrently, the governor tactically maneuvered against him. During Obasa’s absence, Sanwo Olu collaborated with his associates to oust the speaker from his role. Although he never overtly discussed this plan amidst various allegations, he refrained from employing thugs or criminals against the speaker, nor did he resort to kidnapping or assassination. Conversely, the speaker fought hard for his position and managed to return to his seat without damaging any government property or inciting chaos in the state.

The people of Rivers, many of whom are ignorant of the agreements between the two conflicting factions or the governor’s initial nomination and election processes, took to the streets in anger. Some blocked roads while others vandalized and destroyed government property. They were merely told that the federal government was withholding their allocations while being informed that they are key revenue generators for the nation, leaving them confused as to why their funds were being delayed. Some politicians are using a reverse psychology tactic to pursue their objectives. Should we expect a government that acknowledges economic sabotage to remain passive while you harm the economy? Are they aware of the number of individuals imprisoned for defacing currency, alongside those who steal and sell infrastructure equipment?

There is a genuine need for political education among many Nigerians, and I question what the National Orientation Agency is doing in this regard. It is common to see numerous Nigerian youths on Instagram expressing rage, resentment, and opinions on issues about which they are ill-informed.