Army Sacks Four Frontline Soldiers Over Alleged Violation of Standing Directive
The Nigerian Army has dismissed four personnel deployed in counter-insurgency operations in the North-East following an alleged breach of a long-standing operational directive.
The action, which took effect on Monday, November 17, 2025, has drawn significant attention due to the lack of clarity surrounding the exact offence committed.
The soldiers identified as Mukaila Mutari (22NA/88/10253), Isah Emmanuel (22NA/83/7262), Kolomo Alex (24NA/86/5151) and Ibrahim Musa (24NA/86/0885) were attached to units engaged in ongoing operations against Boko Haram and ISWAP.
Photographs circulating online show the dismissed troops dressed in desert combat uniforms, suggesting they were actively involved in field missions before their removal.
Although the army confirmed that the men violated a “standing order,” the nature of the directive has not been officially disclosed. In military operations, standing orders are long-term instructions that guide troop conduct, movement, engagement rules, equipment handling and interaction with civilians.
They remain in force until formally changed by superior command. Violations can attract penalties ranging from reprimand to outright dismissal, depending on the severity of the breach.
Security observers note that the dismissals come at a sensitive period for troops in the region. Recent disruptions, including ambushes on patrol units and heightened insurgent activity around key operational corridors, have intensified pressure on commanders to enforce discipline and maintain strict adherence to directives. Some analysts argue that the swift dismissal signals the army’s determination to reinforce internal order at a time when operational lapses could carry costly consequences.
However, the absence of clear information about the specific infraction has generated mixed reactions. While some commentators commend the military for taking decisive action, others warn that such opaque disciplinary measures can erode morale among personnel risking their lives at the frontlines.
Families of the affected soldiers are also seeking clarity, as dismissal from service may affect their entitlements and future employment prospects.
As of this report, the Nigerian Army has not issued a public statement detailing the circumstances leading to the disciplinary action. Stakeholders in the defence community continue to call for greater transparency, noting that clear communication helps build public trust and ensures that disciplinary actions are not misinterpreted.
