PDP Stakeholder Urges Merit-Based Leadership, Criticizes Geographical Zoning

Oladimeji Fabiyi, a senior stakeholder in the People’s Democratic Party (PDP), has openly criticized the party’s continued reliance on geographical zoning for political appointments, describing it as ineffective and counterproductive.

Speaking in an interview with Channels Television, Fabiyi asserted, “Geographical zoning has not helped us in this country. We can zone to performance, competence, and credibility.”

Fabiyi’s comments come at a time when the PDP is facing intense scrutiny over its zoning arrangements ahead of the 2027 presidential election. Traditionally, the party rotates key positions among Nigeria’s six geopolitical zones to promote inclusiveness and national cohesion.

However, critics argue that this system often emphasizes regional origin over the quality and capability of leaders, potentially compromising governance.

According to Fabiyi, focusing on geography rather than merit risks weakening the party’s national appeal and undermining its credibility.

“Prioritizing a candidate’s region over their ability to perform does a disservice not only to the party but to the nation,” he noted.

“Leadership should be based on competence, integrity, and proven capacity to deliver results for the people.”

The PDP stakeholder also expressed concern that zoning policies have historically caused internal friction and fostered divisive politics within the party.

He called for a shift toward merit-based selection, stressing that credible leadership is essential for national development and political stability.

Political analysts say Fabiyi’s remarks echo a broader debate in Nigeria about the efficacy of zoning as a political tool. While it was originally intended to ensure fair representation and prevent marginalization, many now argue that strict adherence to zoning can limit access to qualified leaders and hinder progress.

Fabiyi’s intervention adds fresh momentum to ongoing discussions within the PDP and across Nigeria about the future of leadership selection. As parties prepare for the 2027 general elections, the tension between regional considerations and meritocracy is expected to remain a critical issue in political discourse.