Miss Emmamson’s Offence Different from Kwam 1’s Infraction, Clarifies NCAA

The Nigerian Civil Aviation Authority (NCAA) has clarified that the incident involving Comfort Emmanson, the passenger accused of assaulting Ibom Air crew members, differs from the case involving the renowned Fuji musician, Wasiu Ayinde, also known as KWAM 1.

During an X Space session on Monday, Mike Achimugu, NCAA’s Director of Public Affairs and Consumer Protection, elaborated on the situation. He noted that the regulatory body did not instruct the airline to prosecute or ban Emmanson, emphasizing that Ibom Air acted autonomously based on the evidence at hand.

“In this scenario, the airline exercised its prerogative to take necessary action, correct? The Airline Operators of Nigeria (AON), relying on some existing evidence, proceeded with their decision while investigations continue, working with what is presently available.

“For those familiar with the industry, witnessing a passenger assault a cabin crew member in such a manner, and the ensuing altercation with those attempting to restrain her, one might concur that the airline was justified in announcing a ban.

“Naturally, as investigations conclude, the ban may be reconsidered or even lifted. However, at present, if the airline deems this action appropriate, one must remember that airline staff are human beings and fellow Nigerians. They are deserving of the same respect afforded to passengers. No one should endure the treatment witnessed on that flight.”

He further recounted a past airport incident where three inebriated individuals caused a disturbance during a flight from London to Nigeria, posing a potential threat to the aircraft’s safety. Despite Air Peace’s grievances, no advisory was issued to blacklist those passengers due to a lack of evidence presented to the NCAA, leaving the matter unresolved.

Achimugu clarified that the NCAA did not advise AON, and AON retains the right to ban or blacklist passengers. He noted that Ibom Air promptly pursued legal action against Emmanson, whereas ValueJet refrained from pressing charges in KWAM 1’s case, leading the NCAA to engage with authorities.

He affirmed the airline’s right to seek prosecution, suggesting that the issue could still be amicably resolved.

“Cabin crew are responsible not only for passenger comfort but also for safety and security on the aircraft. They possess the authority to act accordingly.

Preventing an aggressor from further assaulting by blocking their path is a form of restraint.

“The crew member was within her rights to attempt to restrain the passenger without physical contact. I am uncertain if this is standard practice, and I will need to consult with the director of Afsek at the NCAA to review the guidelines. Nonetheless, there are various methods to manage an unruly passenger, and standard practices can evolve,” he concluded.