Sani: Opposition Figures Frustrated Over Exclusion, Not Driven By Public Interest
Former Kaduna Central Senator Shehu Sani has accused some opposition figures in Nigeria of being driven by personal frustration over political exclusion rather than genuine concern for public interest. In a recent media interaction, Sani described many of the critics of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s administration as “emergency opponents” whose sudden activism stems from disappointment over not being appointed into government positions
According to Sani, Nigerians must distinguish between true advocates of democracy and individuals whose criticism is motivated by envy and anger at being left out of power. He argued that many of the loudest voices attacking the current administration were either silent or complicit when they held influential positions in previous governments.
“Some of these voices you hear today attacking the government were nowhere to be found when real activism was needed. They are not standing on principle. They are simply angry that they were not given ministerial appointments or other positions in this administration,” Sani said.
He specifically mentioned former governors Nasir El-Rufai and Rotimi Amaechi, accusing them of being part of the system that contributed to the very challenges they now complain about. He said insecurity, poverty, and economic hardship were all worsened by the policies and decisions made under their leadership.
“You can not destroy a house and then stand outside blaming the new occupants for not fixing it fast enough. They are trying to wear the garment of patriots, but they are merely frustrated politicians,” he added.
Sani emphasized the need for Nigerians to critically examine the motives behind political criticism, noting that some critics only speak out when they are excluded from power. He said true opposition should be built on principles and a consistent track record of defending public interest.
“Nigerians must learn to separate genuine progressives from those whose activism begins when they are out of favour. If they had been offered positions, would they still be speaking out today?” he asked.
Sani’s remarks come as public debate continues over the direction of the Tinubu administration and the intentions of former allies who have turned critics. With the 2027 general elections drawing closer, political analysts believe such statements reflect growing tensions within the political class.
He reiterated his position that while criticism is vital in any democracy, it must come from a place of integrity and not personal disappointment. “Criticism is essential in any democracy, but it must come from a place of conviction and not convenience,” he said.
