Double Standard of Public Opinion: A Case of Selective Outrage
It’s intriguing to observe how public opinion can be swayed by emotions and biases, often leading to a double standard in the way we respond to similar situations.
A recent example has highlighted this phenomenon, where the same individuals who were quick to believe unsubstantiated claims against a prominent figure are now demanding evidence and questioning the credibility of a different accusation.
The initial claim, which alleged that Seyi Tinubu had offered a politician N100m and had him beaten up, was swallowed hook, line, and sinker by many, without any evidence to support it. However, when a similar accusation was made against another individual, the same people suddenly became skeptical and began to ask questions.
This selective outrage suggests that they are aware of what they are doing and are choosing to apply different standards to different situations.
A similar incident occurred when a journalist posted a video showcasing the underdeveloped state of Burkina Faso. Instead of acknowledging the reality of the situation, the online mob descended upon the journalist, trolling and hounding them until they deleted the video. This reaction is a stark contrast to the way similar issues are handled in Nigeria, where progressive developments are often ignored or downplayed, and lies are spread to paint the country in a negative light.
It appears that there is a coordinated effort to undermine Nigeria’s progress and reputation, with a reach that extends beyond the country’s borders. This campaign of misinformation and deception is well-funded and sophisticated, with tentacles that stretch as far as Eastern Europe. The Nigerian government would do well to take note of this phenomenon and take steps to counter it, rather than simply ignoring it or hoping it will go away.
In a related development, a US-based activist and journalist, Dr. Sandra, has made a startling allegation against Senator Natasha, claiming that she was offered N200m to frame a prominent Nigerian politician, Akpabio, for organ harvesting. While the credibility of this claim has yet to be verified, it highlights the need for a more nuanced and balanced approach to public discourse, where accusations are not taken at face value, and evidence is demanded before judgment is passed.
Ultimately, the double standard of public opinion is a reflection of our own biases and prejudices. By recognizing and acknowledging these biases, we can work towards creating a more informed and balanced public discourse, where accusations are treated with skepticism and evidence is demanded before judgment is passed. Only then can we hope to create a more just and equitable society, where the truth is valued above emotions and biases.
